Thermaltake has been in the PC case market for years, but recently they have made a push into gaming peripherals. With their Contac Silent 12, Thermaltake is looking to make a splash in the crowded market of mice and keyboards.
The thermaltake contac silent 12 vs noctua is a comparison of the Thermaltake Contac Silent 12 and Noctua NH-U12S. The two coolers were tested on an Intel Core i7 4790K overclocked to 4.0GHz.
Thermaltake’s new Contac Silent 12 is one of those coolers that has piqued the interest of those looking to create a system that runs cooler while still allowing for some overclocking. According to Thermaltake’s website, the cooler will be quiet and perform well in all tests. Because I’ve tried a lot of CPU coolers, I wanted to see how it performed and whether it could compete with some of the finest CPU coolers on the market. To find out whether it’s worth your $25, read the entire review.
|Compatibility||LGA 1366/1156/1155/1151/1150/775 Intel AMD AM4/FM2/FM1/AM3+/AM3/AM2+/AM2 AMD AM4/FM2/FM1/AM3+/AM3/AM2+/AM2 AMD AM4/FM2/FM|
|Dimension||Dimensions: 153H*127W*75.3L mm|
|Material for the Heatsink||Copper Heatpipes with Aluminum Fins|
|Heatpipe||6 mm x 4 pieces|
|Dimension||120 x 120 x 25 mm fan (L xW x H)|
|The number of fans||1pcs|
|Fan Speed||RPM: 500-1500 RPM: 400-1100 RPM: 500-1500 RPM: 400-1100 RPM: 500-1500 R (with LNC )|
|Voltage to Begin||9.0 V|
|Currently rated||0.17 A|
|Input Power||2.04 W|
|Air Flow||74.33 CFM|
|Pressure in the Air||mm-H2O = 1.68 mm-H2O|
|Noise in the acoustics||22.1 dBA 28.8 dBA 28.8 dBA (with LNC)|
|Fan Lifetime/Lifetime/Lifetime/Lifetime/Lifetime/Lifetime/Lifetime||40,000 hours of work|
|connect the pins||LNC Plus 4 pin PWM (Low-Noise Cable) Fan speed and noise may be decreased by 27% and 24%, respectively.|
|Cooling Capacity||150 W|
So, based on the specifications sheet, everything is regular and nothing is top-of-the-line, which is quite reasonable given that this is a cheap CPU cooler. The fan speed ranges from 500 to 1500 RPM, which ideally implies it will operate quietly since the maximum speed does not exceed 2000 RPM. The airflow and air pressure are good, but the true test will reveal how much cooling it can provide. For now, let’s look at the cooler itself.
The heatsink is separated from the fan in the box, and there is a tiny white cardboard holding the accessories, which is comparable to most of the coolers out there.
You can see from the pictures above that it only comes with a few items, and Thermaltake has done a great job of cutting costs to provide you excellent value for your money. As a result, this strategy appeals to me. The fan is intended to be attached to the heatsink by a single bracket with two clips. A tiny package contains four black screws and four white plastic screws. There is also a handbook and a Low Noise Cable included.
This is extremely simple, and I’ve never seen anything less with any other cooler. However, this does not imply that it is a disadvantage or restriction. Less is better if it can serve many purposes. However, when I opened the package, I was looking for the thermal paste tube only to discover that there is a tiny pouch that holds the paste in a very restricted amount that may allegedly satisfy your need at a maximum of two times. However, I doubt it will benefit you the second time around. This is a terrible choice.
Getting a good look at it
The heatsink is standard, with each fin measuring 0.4mm thick and 2.2mm apart. Because the heatsink is ergonomic and the fins are neither too powerful nor too weak, it may have two fans on both sides at the same time. It’s of average quality, but don’t put too much pressure on it since it may bend easily, unlike the MSI Core Frozr L cooler, which has a very robust heatsink.
Theoretically, it should function well and provide enough airflow between the fins, but we’ll have to wait and see how it performs in the benchmarks.
When it comes to the base, it features four copper heat pipes exposed at the bottom, as well as an aluminum heatsink foundation, which will transfer heat from the CPU to the main heatsink above. The foundation is well polished, and it outperforms the Cooler Master Hyper 212 LED Turbo cooler’s base.
The base also includes a pre-installed bracket with two screws on two sides that secures it to the base. You may remove it if you like, but you won’t be able to install the cooler without it.
Although the Thermaltake website describes it as a good airflow fan, the air pressure fan is more geared towards air pressure than airflow since the blades are larger and the speed range is only 500-1500RPM, which is too low when compared to a good airflow fan.
This fan’s quality isn’t great, but it’ll keep the heatsink cold enough. The heatsink will be attached to the screw holes using the supplied clamps, however this fan can only be utilized as a chassis fan. The cord, like the BioniX F120 Gaming Fan, is properly secured.
[nextpage title=”Setup and Testing Rig”]
I removed the old thermal paste off the CPU and cleaned the base of the heatsink as well, as is customary, to ensure the best results.
The cooler is installed using a universal mount, which is sufficient for any Intel or AMD platform, including AM4. As a result, the fact that Thermaltake was able to design a single bracket that supports all of the sockets while lowering the total cost is a huge plus.
The four black screws are used to hold the bracket, and the white plastic screws are used to tighten it since the bracket would be loose without these white screws, and you could practically shake it with your hands. Although it is not as robust as a conventional bracket, it is extremely simple to use since the back panel of your case is not removed. It’s a breeze to set up and a ten out of ten installation method.
I used the Arctic MX-4 paste that came with the BioniX F120 fans once they were installed. It’s a well-known thermal compound with a good track record.
Now it was time to attach the heatsink, and wow! It uses the same installation technique as the AM3 and AM4 platforms, which involves connecting two clips to the bracket’s plastic lock. This is the worst kind of installation, and I despise it more than any other. If you’re reading this, Thermaltake, please don’t use it in any cooler. It’s just my humble opinion.
I tried my hardest to push the clips from both sides, but it was so tough that I felt I should stop or my motherboard socket pins might break. But, after many attempts, I finally succeeded. I’m not sure whether I’m the only one who has trouble with this kind of setup or if it’s truly terrible. In any case, here’s what the final result looks like once the fan is installed.
Unlike other air coolers I tried, there was no issue with Ram clearance, and you can easily add tall memory. This is a nice PRO. [nextpage title=”Benchmarks and Summary”]
Methodology for Testing
I utilized my testing setup for testing, which I also use for other purposes:-
Check out the Intel Core i5 6600K on Amazon.
Amazon has the Asus Z170 Pro Gaming.
Corsair Vengeance LPX 2x 4GB DDR4 2400Mhz: Check Amazon
Amazon has a 320GB WD HDD.
Check out Amazon for the TP-Link N300 Wifi PCI Card.
Check out Amazon for the Cooler Master MasterWatt Lite 500W.
Check out Amazon for the Cooler Master 690 III.
1x 120mm Corsair AF fan: For further information, see the Amazon link at the bottom of the page. 1x DeepCool TF120 120mm fan (from radiator): Look into Amazon.
I tested the fans at 25 degrees Celsius, which I measured using a Digital LCD thermometer, and kept in mind whether the ambient temperature changed at any point throughout the test. CPUID HWMonitor was used to measure CPU temperature and fan speed, and the Asus AI Suite 3 was utilized to overclock the CPU. I utilized Bios as well as Asus AI Suite 3 to adjust the fan speed.
I used a digital noise tester to test the noise.
I also left the side panels open to allow for maximum circulation and cooling.
For stress testing the CPU, I utilized the HeavyLoad program and performed the benchmark for 15 minutes each time I altered the clock speed or fan speed. And in between testing, I allowed it plenty of time to cool down and return to its original temperature.
In terms of temperature graph performance, the cooler is excellent, and as you can see, it can be utilized to overclock an i5 or even an i7 to a respectable clock rate. When the CPU is completely overclocked, temperatures below 70C are deemed acceptable, and at 25C room temperature, this cooler works well.
Because the Digital LCD noise meter can only function at close range, I kept it a few cms away from the cooler while measuring noise, and the following findings were obtained.
The decibel level at 500RPM is 18dbA, which is not ideal. At this modest pace, it should be about 15dbA. Similarly, at 1520RPM, the noise level is about 29dbA, which is typical and not very impressive. Its noise performance is poor when compared to its cooling capabilities. I’m curious, if the fan speed range was more than 2000RPM, how much noise would this fan have produced, 35dbA?
[rwp box id=”0′′] rwp box id=”0′′] rwp box
-Understand the significance of these honors
The thermaltake contac silent 12 removal is a review of the Thermaltake Contac Silent 12. It is a gaming mouse with a sensor that can be adjusted to any surface and has an adjustable weight system.
- thermaltake contac silent 12 reddit
- thermaltake contac silent 12 vs hyper 212 evo
- thermaltake contac silent 12 cpu cooler reviews
- thermaltake contac silent 12 installation intel
- thermaltake contac 9 cpu cooler review